A Critique of Instrumentalism: Why realism matters

نویسنده

  • John Lewis
چکیده

Instrumentalism is the dominant methodological position amongst orthodox economists, which holds that realism of the theories is irrelevant. This paper challenges this view, arguing that the standard instrumentalist defence of abstract theories is inapplicable when the goal of the analysis is not prediction. Moreover, it demonstrates that the good empirical performance does not confer legitimacy on a theory to be used for other purposessuch as conducting a welfare analysis. This has wide ranging implications for the subject, suggesting that the current emphasis on using abstract macroeconomic models to derive policy recommendations on the basis of the welfare of the representative agent is invalid. More generally, it implies that the twin goals of predictive parsimony, and unifying macroeconomics with microfoundations and welfare economics are mutually incompatible. ∗The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Bank of Estonia.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Tenets of Early Critical Writings on Fiction in Iran

From the first commentaries of Akhundzadeh to Jamalzadeh’s introduction to Yeki Bud YekiNabud, i.e., over a period of almost fifty years, we can see a collection of a few scattered commentaries on story and novel which are rarely noticed by researchers. These scattered commentaries can be regarded as the first literary manifests of story and novel. These critiques and commentaries include subje...

متن کامل

The uncritical realism of realist evaluation

This paper is a response to Ray Pawson’s critique of critical realism, the philosophy of science elaborated by Roy Bhaskar. I argue that Pawson misinterprets critical realism’s positions on both natural and social science. His charges concerning its totalising ontology, its arrogant epistemology, and its naive methodology are largely unfounded, such that the differences between critical realism...

متن کامل

Realism, instrumentalism, and scientific symbiosis: psychological theory as a search for truth and the discovery of solutions.

Scientific realism holds that scientific theories are approximations of universal truths about reality, whereas scientific instrumentalism posits that scientific theories are intellectual structures that provide adequate predictions of what is observed and useful frameworks for answering questions and solving problems in a given domain. These philosophical perspectives have different strengths ...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2004